TL;DR
Get gifts for the two of you delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Bolde report draws on psychology research and clinical commentary to explain how sharing setbacks and uncertainty can help people feel closer. The cited findings suggest people often respond to others’ vulnerability more positively than they expect, but the research does not mean that every personal detail belongs in every conversation.
A Bolde report describes how sharing uncertainty, setbacks or other personal struggles can foster a sense of closeness between friends, drawing on commentary from clinical psychologist Geraldine Piorkowski and research on disclosure and vulnerability. The report contrasts the connection that can follow an honest admission with the admiration people may feel when a friend shares only good news.
The report’s central distinction is between admiration and intimacy. A friend’s pregnancy, promotion or other success may be happy news, but hearing the headline does not necessarily reveal what the person has experienced. In its example, a friend announces a pregnancy without describing the difficulty and uncertainty that preceded it. The listener can celebrate while still knowing little more about the friend’s inner life.
Piorkowski, writing about vulnerability and closeness, says that sharing vulnerabilities is risky but offers a reliable path to meaningful adult relationships. The report explains that people may hold back because they anticipate an awkward pause, judgment or regret. In doing so, they can share many facts about their lives while keeping the emotional experience behind those facts private.
The report also cites research by Emily Prinsloo and Irene Scopelliti on how people calibrate what they disclose. It says that when two friends had both experienced a setback, 87 percent chose to share their own; when one person had good news and the other did not, 16 percent brought up the success. Those figures describe the scenarios reported in the source; the supplied material does not give study dates, sample sizes or further methodological details.
How Honesty Can Change a Friendship
The findings offer one explanation for why conversations can feel different after someone shares more than a polished account of their life. An admission such as being nervous about a presentation or struggling with a new role gives a friend access to the feeling behind the facts. If that disclosure is met with warmth rather than judgment, the exchange can become more personal, according to the report.
That shift can also make disclosure reciprocal. When one person shares a difficulty, the other may feel able to acknowledge a similar experience. The cited pattern in the disclosure research suggests that people may respond to someone else’s setback differently than to their success: difficult news can create an opening for mutual sharing, while good news may feel harder to match in that moment.
The point is not that success stories are shallow or that friends should stop celebrating one another. The report says milestones remain worth sharing. Rather, it suggests that success alone may not provide the same access to a person’s fears, doubts or unmet needs. For readers, that distinction can help explain why a relationship may feel friendly and supportive yet still lack a sense of deeper understanding.
Popular right now
Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grade Blender, 64 oz. Container, Black
Bose QuietComfort True Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation, Black
LG 85-Inch QNED84B Mini LED 4K Smart TV (2026)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Research Behind the Vulnerability Effect
The report also describes research by Anna Bruk of the University of Mannheim on how people perceive vulnerability. It says that across seven studies, people judged other people’s vulnerable moments more positively than their own, a pattern Bruk calls the “beautiful mess effect.” According to the report, the pattern appeared in both hypothetical scenarios and real tasks.
The proposed explanation is a difference in perspective. People experience their own vulnerability from the inside, where awkward details and possible consequences can loom large. When they observe someone else opening up, they may see the act more broadly and interpret it as courage or authenticity, rather than focusing on every imperfection. This may help explain why people fear disclosure more than listeners react to it, though the report does not establish that every listener will respond supportively.
The source frames vulnerability as gradual rather than unlimited. A person can share one honest sentence, notice how the other person responds and decide whether to say more. It cautions that revealing too much too quickly can feel overwhelming rather than intimate. The report therefore presents openness as a matter of trust and pacing, not a requirement to recount every painful detail.
““Even though sharing vulnerabilities is risky, it is the most reliable pathway to close, meaningful relationships in adulthood.””
— Geraldine Piorkowski, clinical psychologist, as quoted in the Bolde report
Limits of the Cited Findings
The supplied report does not include full citations, publication dates, sample sizes or detailed methods for the studies attributed to Prinsloo and Scopelliti and Bruk. The 87 percent and 16 percent figures should therefore be read as results described by the source, not as universal rates for all friendships or conversations.
The findings also do not show that vulnerability always produces closeness. The report acknowledges the risks of disclosure and does not establish how a listener will respond, how much is appropriate to share in a particular relationship, or whether the effects persist over time. It presents a psychological explanation for a common experience, not a guarantee that opening up will improve every relationship.
A Gradual Approach to Opening Up
The report gives no new study, follow-up announcement or next research milestone. Its practical takeaway is to start with one proportionate, honest disclosure—for example, saying that a situation is harder than expected—and pay attention to the other person’s response before sharing more.
For readers weighing whether to open up, the source’s account supports taking the relationship and the moment into consideration. Sharing vulnerability is described as a way to invite mutual understanding, not an obligation to disclose private information. Whether that invitation leads to greater closeness depends on the response and circumstances, which the cited material does not predict.
Key Questions
Why might sharing vulnerability make friends feel closer?
According to the report, vulnerability lets a person share the feelings behind life events, not only the events themselves. A supportive response can help turn a pleasant conversation into a more personal exchange.
Does sharing good news make a friendship less meaningful?
No. The report says successes and milestones are worth celebrating. Its distinction is that good news may inspire admiration, while sharing uncertainty or setbacks can give friends a different kind of insight into each other.
What does the “beautiful mess effect” mean?
It is the term Anna Bruk uses, as described in the report, for the finding that people judged others’ vulnerable moments more positively than their own. The report suggests people may see their own exposure up close but view someone else’s openness as courage or authenticity.
Does closeness require telling a friend everything?
No. The report warns that sharing too much too quickly can feel overwhelming. It describes closeness as something that may grow through small, honest disclosures and a response that shows trust.
Source: bolde.com
